Our Services, Learn more about Agriculture, land & estates, Learn more about Community group projects, Learn more about Rural business succession, By That criteria is set down in the case of Alcock v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police (aka the Hillsborough case) and in full, requires:-. or find out more about all As can be seen, none of these criteria are particularly strict. View all Business services here, Modern Slavery Act Transparency Statement, a close tie of love and affection with the primary victim, witnessed the event or the ‘immediate aftermath’ of the event, direct perception of the harm to the primary victim; and. Know your victim: Primary or Secondary! The work accident was a single accident that had two consequences. Secondary victims: “control mechanisms” (1) The psychiatric injury arose from witnessing the injury or death of, or extreme danger or discomfort to, the primary victim (2) The injury arose from sudden and unexpected shock (3) There were close ties of love and affection between … 4. The House of Lords in Alcock set out a strict criteria for secondary victim claims with the aim of preventing the potentially huge increase in personal injury claims. A primary victim is someone who has been directly involved in an accident, whereas a secondary victim is someone who has witnessed the distressing events but has not been directly involved. Secondary victim claimants must prove that:- 1. In the case of Shorter, a case was brought by a radiographer who came across her sister in hospital, following injuries sustained in an accident. Firstly, the injuries that Mrs Taylor sustained and secondly, her death three weeks later. 3 December 2019 0 CommentsPosted in Medical Negligence, Opinion. Medical negligence solicitors who understand what you’re going through, Copyright © Royds Withy King LLP 2019 suffered psychiatric injury due to a sudden shocking event. Although the mother appeared to make a good recovery, weeks following the accident, the injuries triggered a deep vein thrombosis and she collapsed and died, at home. A person who witnesses a horrifying event and has a close relationship with someone involved in the event is able to seek damages as a secondary victim. Further, to allow the daughter to succeed in that set of circumstances would be in direct contrast to the ‘immediate aftermath’ doctrine. Who is a Secondary Victim? It was held that the man’s wife was in a state that was ordinarily expected of a person in hospital, given the circumstances in which she found herself. It was argued by her representatives, that as a result of her profession, the sister had a greater degree of insight than that of the ordinary man. It must be caused by seeing or hearing the relevant incident or its … There should be a list of relationships that would be sufficient to satisfy the criteria for claims as a secondary victim, and I would expect that close friends’/family members would also satisfy by introducing this legislation.. Given that, it was held that the death of the mother was not a relevant ‘horrifying event’ in terms of the Alcock criteria and the case failed as a result. You can find out more and how to manage & delete cookies we place on your device here. The Judge in Ronayne made it clear that the mere sight of a relative receiving hospital treatment is unlikely to be viewed as “horrifying” to allow recovery of damages. Perhaps as more cases start being pursued through the court process this may change. Here's how you know. Her immediate thought was that someone must be suffering as a result of this and it looked serious. A person who witnesses a horrifying event and has a close relationship with someone involved in the event is able to seek damages as a secondary victim. She waited for her son but he failed to turn up. The first was that to extend liability to a case such as that would mean that the daughter would potentially have been able to recover in the event that her mother died months or even years following the original accident. The second reason was that to allow the daughter to make a recovery would be to extend the scope of liability to secondary victims considerably further and any expansion of secondary victim recovery was a matter for Parliament rather than the Courts. The Claimant must be in close proximity in time and space to the relevant event (if there is one) or its immediate aftermath. Thank you for choosing to leave a comment. A secondary victim is one who suffers nervous shock without himself/herself being directly exposes to any physical danger in the accident to the primary victim. SUMMARY OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR A SECONDARY VICTIM CLAIM 1. An example of this is a spectator at a car race, who witnesses a terrible crash caused by negligence on the part of the car manufacturers and develops a nervous illness as a … See further Practice Note: Psychiatric injury—secondary victims—case tracker. As a result, given her greater understanding of the situation and her medical insight, she was more likely to find the sight of her sister in hospital, and the events that were unfolding, more “horrifying”. It is not sufficient, in the case of injury to a secondary victim, for the claimant to show that as a result of apprehending the infliction of physical injury or the risk of it to another person they have sustained nervous shock which caused psychiatric illness. The test for whether someone is considered a secondary victim was set out in the wake of the Hillsborough disaster, and to be successful it must proved that they have: The strict test is such that it limits the number of claimants where the immediate aftermath is heavily publicised. Here, Lucy Crawford from our fatal claims team explains. In Ronayne, the pursuer’s husband attempted to bring a claim for damages alleging that he was psychiatrically harmed following sight of his wife in hospital. Secondary victimisation occurs when the victim suffers further harm not as a direct result of the criminal act but due to the manner in which institutions and other individuals deal with the victim. Please keep in mind that comments are moderated and please do not use a spammy keyword or a domain as your name or it will be deleted. She went to the front desk of the gym and asked them to check if her son had signed in but he had not. Our Services, Learn more about Business law & contracts, Learn more about Charities & social enterprise, Learn more about Construction & engineering, Learn more about Coronavirus advice for business, Learn more about Employment law for employers, Learn more about Entrepreneurs, growth & investment, Learn more about EU, regulatory & procurement, Learn more about Buying and Selling a Franchise, Learn more about Franchise Agreement Lawyers, Learn more about Franchising Your Business, Learn more about International Franchising, Learn more about Infrastructure & projects, Learn more about Guidance and practice notes, Learn more about Managing operational projects, Learn more about NPD and revenue funded projects, Learn more about Intellectual property & technology, Learn more about Litigating IP disputes in Scotland, Learn more about Planning & environmental, Learn more about Restructuring & insolvency, Learn more about our services for She was successful and the court found: I do not think this case ultimately extends the law as the facts are very specific and it is not overly common to witness the event itself, such as in childbirth. She began to feel worried when her son failed to attend the gym, she was being comforted and a staff member went to speak to a police officer. The Court of Appeal held that the case was a novel one, given the circumstances. A close tie of love and affection with the person killed, injured or endangered; Proximity to the incident in time and space; Perception by sight or hearing of the incident; To successfully bring a secondary victim claim, case law sets out that the following criteria must be met; There must be a ‘close tie of love and affection’ between the primary and secondary victims. It was held that the mother did come within the class of a secondary victim. Because of this, it is often helpful to think of each of them as existing along a spectrum, in combination with the seriousness of the involved incident, so a relationship spectrum, a proximity spectrum, and a perception spectrum. Secondary victims are people who suffer a psychological reaction when someone they know is either killed or seriously injured in an accident. Rural Economy It is therefore not what you would call a series of accumulative events. Found in: PI & Clinical Negligence. 2. On the day of his death, the mother arranged to meet her son at their local gymnasium in Glasgow. The nervous shock suffered by the secondary victim must be a medically recognized psychiatric illness. Published 21 noviembre 2018. Skip to main content An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice. or find out more about all Alcock is the case of the Hillsborough Stadium football ground disaster. Secondary victims are often rarely reported or considered even though their mental health can be severely impacted upon. However, a secondary victim is someone who suffers psychiatric injury due to witnessing negligence to a primary victim, but who was not at risk … DAC Beachcroft were involved in this successful strike out application in which the Court confirmed that the Claimant did not fulfil the necessary criteria for a secondary victim claiming for psychiatric injury. Negligence, nervous shock, primary and secondary victims: Alcock v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police [1991] UKHL 5, [1992] 1 AC 310 is a leading English tort law case on liability for nervous shock (psychiatric injury). They came across the immediate aftermath of the event 3. When making a claim for psychiatric injury there are two types of victim: primary and secondary victims. We use these to enhance your site experience and assist in our marketing efforts. Individuals and Families See further Practice Note: Psychiatric injury—secondary victims—case tracker. interiura.com. She noted on her approach to the gymnasium that there was a traffic jam that resulted in the traffic being diverted at the roundabout near the gym. As she did so, she was aware of police activity. In order to be successful in such a claim, you must be able to prove that there has been psychiatric harm as a result of the events. To bring a successful claim the following must be established:- That there was a “close tie of love and affection” with the primary victim of the accident. Facts. The sight has to be exceptional in nature. The recent High Court decision in YAH -v- Medway NHS Foundation Trust is a helpful reminder of the principles to be considered when deciding the 'status' of an injured party and the importance of getting it right. Maintained • Found in: PI & Clinical Negligence. That said, modern psychiatrists and psychologists have a whole battery of tests and diagnostic criteria that can be applied in order to assess and measure the extent of psychological injury. Often the hardest part of the test to prove is that of a “shocking” event which must be exception, sudden and horrifying. She checked her phone and spotted that there were six missed calls and began to feel worried. Certain people may find it more frightening to have no medical knowledge at all and not understand what was going on compared to those who have an insurmountable knowledge of medicine. © Copyright 2020 Harper Macleod LLP All rights reserved, Please don't provide anything sensitive here, like health details, or your credit card number, Doing business in the Highlands, Islands & Moray, Armed Forces Compensation Scheme Scotland, Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), Whiplash Injury Claims Solicitors in Glasgow, Road Traffic Accident Claims in Edinburgh, Personal Injury Claims Inverness & Highlands, Accident At Work Claims in Inverness & Highlands, Cycling Accident Claims in Inverness & Highlands, Motorbike Accident Claims in Inverness & Highlands, Pedestrian Accident Claims in Inverness & Highlands, Road Traffic Accident Claims in Inverness & Highlands, Whiplash Injury Claims in Inverness & Highlands. She began to feel hysterical and was comforted by a friend. However, my question is whether she could also be considered a secondary victim as she (arguably) witnessed someone else being endangered or harmed (i.e her son). They have direct perception of the harm to the primary victim 4. Royds Withy King is the trading name of Royds Withy King LLP Witness the event with their own unaided senses . This report examines psychiatric damage claims for secondary victims, who face restrictive controls which have limited the amount of meritorious claims significantly. There must be a close relationship of love and affection between the primary victim and the secondary victim. For secondary victims to succeed in a claim for psychiatric harm they must meet the following criteria: 1. She arrived at the gymnasium and there was a lot of chatter about the crash and a boy had been knocked down. In order to be successful in such a claim, you must be able to prove that there has been psychiatric harm as a result of the events. Secondary Victim Cases – in the Context of Tort Cases Generally The Need for Control Mechanisms in Secondary Victim Cases (a) The relationship between 2V and PV (close ties of love and affection) (b) 2V’s experience of the threat or injury to PV –Physical proximity to … A primary victim is involved as an active participant and suffers physical injury (or was at risk of suffering physical injury) due to someone else’s negligence. Each of the claimants had either been present at the … Relatives of some of the 96 Liverpool football fans who were crushed to death unsuccessfully sought damages for the psychiatric injuries which they suffered. Secondary victims must demonstrate the four Alcock criteria are present in order to establish liability: 1. A secondary victim is: a person who is present at the scene of a violent crime and who is injured as a direct result of witnessing that crime; or a person injured as a direct result of subsequently becoming aware of an act of violence and who is the parent/guardian of the primary victim who was under the age of 18 at the time the criminal act was committed. A secondary victim is one who suffers psychiatric injury not by being directly involved in the incident but by witnessing it and either: • seeing injury being sustained by a primary victim, or • fearing injury to a primary victim. Is the mother a primary or secondary victim? 26 Aug 2015. The Court had to address whether the mother suffered a shock and subsequent injury as a result of the trauma caused by coming upon the immediate aftermath of the crash rather than being told of her son’s death. The last few years have seen a number of secondary victim cases come before the Court in a bid to satisfy the Alcock criteria and clarify the concept of a ‘horrifying event’. Psychiatric injury—secondary victims Practice notes. The Court was required to decide whether the event satisfied the Alcock criteria. Psychiatric injury must be a result of a shocking event. Secondary victims are people who suffer a psychological reaction when someone they know is either killed or seriously injured in an accident. Psychiatric illness 2. She saw the damaged vehicle against the tree and she appreciated the suffering that those involved must be feeling. face criteria such as proving a recognised psychiatric disorder caused by actionable negligence, and only a fraction of secondary victims are able to do so. 2. Marina Harper Our Services, Learn more about EU, regulatory & competition, Learn more about our services for The sight of a loved one hooked up to machines and wires can be alarming but may not be as serious as one may first think. She eventually found a parking space in a side street and walked towards the gymnasium. This case is currently being considered by the Appeal Courts so there is likely to be further development in this area of law. The case centred upon the liability of the police for the nervous shock suffered in consequence of the events of the Hillsborough disaster. She came upon the aftermath of the accident. The Scottish case of Young v MacVean provides a helpful example. These principles have been reiterated in recent case law (e.g. The Master of the Rolls, Lord Dyson, looked again at secondary victim claims and reiterated that the strict control mechanisms set out by the (then) House of Lords in the post-Hillsborough disaster decision of Alcock, in 1992, should be applied by Judges to limit the ambit of permissible secondary victim claims unless Parliament interv… To qualify as a secondary victim a claimant must: have a relationship of love and affection with the primary victim; come across the ‘immediate aftermath’ of the event; have direct perception of the harm to the primary victim; and Find out more. But this wasn’t taken forward and the courts still refer back to the Alcock test as main authority. We will only use data from this form to process your enquiry. Witness the event with their own unaided senses . As one of Scotland's leading full service law firms, Harper Macleod LLP has specialists across all legal disciplines, covering every service you are likely to need in both your business and personal life. These three criteria combined provide the basis for a claim as a secondary victim. The event must be “horrifying” and the harm must be such that it is foreseeable. Since the case of Alcock v Chief Constable of Yorkshire Police was decided following the Hillsborough disaster in 1989, it has been well established that certain criteria must be met by the Claimant, to successfully bring a compensation claim for psychiatric injury as a secondary victim. However, a secondary victim is someone who suffers psychiatric injury due to witnessing negligence to a primary victim, but who was not at risk of physical injury themselves. Psychiatric injury claims for nervous shock Claiming for psychiatric injury as a secondary victim. interiura.com. The Alcock decision was issued by the House of Lords in 1992 and its principles remain central to the law. She had sustained injuries as a result of negligence and he was thus attempting to claim against the defender. A primary victim is involved as an active participant and suffers physical injury (or was at risk of suffering physical injury) due to someone else’s negligence. The maximum values shown above constitute the maximum limit for the compensation to a secondary victim in connection with a serious prejudice to the familial relationship, on the basis of serious injuries suffered by the primary victim. The maximum values shown above constitute the maximum limit for the compensation to a secondary victim in connection with a serious prejudice to the familial relationship, on the basis of serious injuries suffered by the primary victim. RE suffered an acute profound hypoxic ischemic insult at the time of birth. Who is a Secondary Victim? A member of staff went outside to speak to police officers at the scene of the crash, they attended at the gymnasium and it was at this point that the mother was advised that her son had died in the crash. The claimants were all classed as secondary victims since they were not in the physical zone of danger. … she suffered PTSD as a result of observing the events of RE’s birth. As a matter of policy the law insists on control mechanisms in order to limit the number of potential claimants who were not the primary victims of tortious conduct. The mother had sustained injuries to her head and left foot in a workplace accident for which her employer admitted responsibility. that the psychiatric injury is caused by ‘shock’ from ‘the sudden appreciation by sight or by sound of a horrifying event, which violently agitates the mind’; that the person had a close tie of love and affection with the immediate victim and; that the person was sufficiently proximate in time and space to the ‘shocking’ event – that generally means that they witnessed it unfold or came upon its ‘immediate aftermath’. As the criteria for bringing a secondary victim claim is much more strict, it has been difficult to succeed in such claims. RE’s condition at birth was a sudden and unexpected event and not a gradual process, there was no prior warning that RE would be born lifeless and require resuscitation, this was not an event of the kind to be expected as ‘part and parcel’ of childbirth, grandmother was present throughout the birth and witnessed the immediate aftermath. The shock had set in prior to confirmation that her son was involved in the accident and had died. or find out more about all While it may be true that there should be limitations on claims as shocking events can affect a very wide number of potential claimants, the regime for secondary victims as it stands is ar… For now, though, it remains a very difficult legal argument to prove, even if someone has died or suffered truly horrific injuries. Had the daughter witnessed the accident herself, she would have been entitled to recover under Alcock but the daughter did not witness the accident and to allow her to recover as a secondary victim on the facts of the case would be a step ‘too far’. Secondary victims- those not directly threatened, often close family members of those injured or killed. It was accepted that this experience had caused the daughter to suffer PTSD. Our Services, Learn more about Buying & selling your home, Learn more about Employment law for employees, Learn more about Child Residence & Contact, Learn more about Elgin & Moray Family Team, Learn more about Inverness & The Highlands Team, Learn more about Mediation & Collaboration, Learn more about Pre-Nuptial & Post-Nuptial Agreements, Learn more about Accident in a public place, Learn more about Armed Forces Compensation Scheme Scotland, Learn more about Occupational & Industrial Diseases, Learn more about Personal Injury Claims Glasgow, Learn more about Personal Injury Claims Edinburgh, Learn more about Personal Injury Claims Inverness & Highlands, Learn more about Personal Injury Claims Elgin, Learn more about Personal Injury Claims Shetland, Learn more about Settlement agreements advice, Learn more about our services for Secondary victims are those not within the physical zone of danger but witnesses of horrific events. The psychiatric injury must be caused by – and result from – a “sudden and unexpected shock”. By clicking "Accept Cookies" you agree to the storing of first and third party cookies on your device. A close tie of love and affection . To investigate this hypothesis, negative and positive effects of criminal proceedings were investigated, as perceived by 137 victims of violent crimes who were involved in trials several years previously. As a reminder, Taylor v Novo (UK) Ltd[2014] QB 150, [2013] EWCA Civ 194, was the first secondary victim claim to go to the Court of Appeal for ten years when it was decided in 2013. 4. From events to a wealth of knowledge on our specialist areas, sign up to stay informed about the latest news and legal updates. Despite some changes in recent years, the law is still inflexible. An example of this is a spectator at a car race, who witnesses a terrible crash caused by negligence on the part of the car manufacturers and … The case concerned the mother of a 26-year-old pedestrian who was killed by a dangerous driver. Ultimately, the court pinpointed the relevant point in time as when the negligence occurred, which, in this case, began when RE’s body remained in the birth canal. The Court of Appeal gave two reasons for that. The daughter was not present at the time of the original accident but did witness her mother’s death at home. Control mechanisms. If the sudden death qualified as being proximate in time and space to the original accident, then the requirements of Alcock would be met and the daughter’s claim would succeed. They have a relationship of love and affection with the primary victim 2. • a secondary victim is someone who is ‘no more than a passive and unwilling witness of an injury to another’. Public Sector She walked past the scene of a crash and was able to see a very badly damaged vehicle up against a tree. Despite this the law remains a challenge for vulnerable victims who have witnessed an awful event, and yet cannot overcome the high burden the courts have set. Because of … She attempted an exercise class whilst still watching for her son. When making a claim for psychiatric injury there are two types of victim: primary and secondary victims. A secondary victim is someone who, when witnessing an accident, suffers injury consequential upon the injury, or fear of injury, to a primary victim. To find out more about claiming damages as a secondary victim, or any of the issues raised in this article please contact our team on: By completing this form you agree to Harper Macleod's Privacy Notice. 3.Proximity to the event itself or its immediate aftermath . The case of RE and others -v- Calderdale and Huddersfield NHS FT [2017] did provide some further clarification. Of some of the original accident but did witness her mother is someone is... Claim as a result of this and it looked serious this area of law years, the mother was classed... Manage & delete cookies we place on your device legal proximity ’ too far for some especially when does. A 26-year-old pedestrian who was killed by a friend is usually through a marital or parental relationship although exclusively. Killed by a friend the following criteria: 1 may change present at the time of the Hillsborough disaster these... Relatives of some of the Negligence and he was thus attempting to claim against the and... Following criteria: 1 someone who is ‘ secondary victim criteria more than a passive and unwilling witness of an to. The police for the psychiatric injury must be such that it is conceivable that criminal cause. Area of law horrifying ” scene or event in consequence of the Hillsborough disaster desk of the 96 football. Recent case law ( e.g witnesses of horrific events claims team explains how to manage & cookies. April 2016 someone they know is either killed or seriously injured in an accident suffer a psychological reaction when they. Each of the claimants were all classed as secondary victims must demonstrate the four Alcock criteria present! Harm to the law case concerned the mother was therefore classed as a result of witnessing. Physical zone of danger but witnesses of horrific events accident was a single accident that had two consequences boy been! Claim as a result of Negligence and he was thus attempting to against. Have direct perception of the harm must be a medically recognized psychiatric illness this wasn ’ t taken forward the. Sought damages for the psychiatric injuries which they suffered did provide some further.. Debates over who would find something horrifying and who would not hysterical was! Stadium football ground disaster case was a novel one, given the circumstances and damages Bill listed! “ horrifying ” and the courts still refer back to the crime victims field a parking in! Fatal claims team explains very badly damaged vehicle up against a tree phone and spotted that there were missed... Itself or its immediate aftermath these criteria are present in order to establish liability:.! Seeing or hearing the relevant Medical knowledge shock Claiming for psychiatric injury must be feeling this area of.! All your legal needs during the Coronavirus pandemic that there were six missed calls and began to feel and! Secondly, her death three weeks later ground disaster either killed or injured... Who is ‘ no more than a passive and unwilling witness of an injury to a shocking. To her head and left foot in a workplace accident for which employer! In order to establish liability: 1 was not long your enquiry -! Basis for a claim for psychiatric harm they must meet the following criteria: 1 unexpected shock ” the. The class of a crash and was comforted by a friend embroiled in debates over who would.. Single accident that had two consequences are often rarely reported or considered even their. To main content an official website of the Negligence and he was thus attempting to claim against tree! Needs during the Coronavirus pandemic not in the physical zone of danger for which employer! Event itself or its … SUMMARY of the events of the 96 Liverpool football fans were! Hysterical and was comforted by a friend sudden shocking event Privacy Notice, Lucy Crawford from our claims. Apply objective standards an injury to another ’ this report examines psychiatric damage claims for secondary victims they. Recover damages for psychiatric injury following the death of her mother ’ s death home. Her mother shock without himself being exposed to danger & Clinical Negligence of. Note: psychiatric injury—secondary victims Practice notes in 1992 and its principles central. The accident and the courts still refer back to the law is still inflexible is. Or injury to another ’ profound hypoxic ischemic insult at the time of birth be.! The physical zone of danger criteria combined provide the basis for a claim for psychiatric injury following death. Pi & Clinical Negligence the following criteria: 1 often rarely reported considered. He failed to turn up shock without himself being exposed to danger which her admitted... A sudden shocking event this may change arranged to meet her son he! A passive and unwilling witness of an injury to another ’ within the class of a event... Attempted an exercise class whilst still watching for her son at their local in... Injury following the death of her mother ’ s death at home news! Two consequences incident or its immediate aftermath the physical zone of danger this ’! Reading of the original accident but did witness her mother as hospitals be... Shocking event not become embroiled in debates over who would find something horrifying and who would not not., sign up to stay informed about the latest news and legal updates the first with... Had set in prior to confirmation that her son was involved in the physical zone of.... You must apply objective standards one does not hold the relevant incident or its aftermath. Is the case centred upon the liability of the United States government, Department Justice! Accumulative events he failed to turn up in a side street and walked towards gymnasium... Witness her mother `` secondary victim a relationship of love and affection between the primary victim 2 was aware police! Criteria are present in order to establish liability: 1 meet her son but he failed to turn.... Bill is listed for 22 April 2016 was required to decide whether the event satisfied Alcock! Them to check if her son had signed in but he failed to turn up harm they meet. Hillsborough Stadium football ground disaster from our fatal claims team explains psychiatric injury—secondary Practice. Does not hold the relevant incident or its immediate aftermath there is likely to be further development in this of. Knowledge on our specialist areas, sign up to stay informed about the latest news and updates! Not hold the relevant Medical knowledge – and result from – a “ sudden and unexpected shock.... And walked towards the gymnasium and there was a novel one, given the circumstances they across. When one does not hold the relevant incident or its … SUMMARY of the and. Reported or considered even though their mental health can be severely impacted upon whilst. The gym and asked them to check if her son had signed in but he failed to turn.. Does not hold the relevant incident or its immediate aftermath of the original accident but did her... And unwilling witness of an injury to another ’ cause psychological harm the... Or parental relationship although not exclusively prove that: - 1 looking for still refer back to the law still! Party cookies on your device watching for her son was involved in accident! And asked them to check if her son but he failed to turn.... Should be addressed comprehensively at the time of the original accident but did witness her mother of... Caused as a secondary victim there must be a close relationship secondary victim criteria love and affection between the victim! Third party cookies on your device, Ca n't find what secondary victim criteria would call a of! Suffering that those involved must be a medically recognized psychiatric illness cookies we place on your.. Victims field is hardly surprising as hospitals can be seen, none of these criteria are strict! Of the REQUIREMENTS for a secondary victim see further Practice Note: psychiatric injury—secondary victims—case tracker which her employer responsibility., given the circumstances and damages Bill is listed for 22 April 2016 a novel one, given the.! Further development in this area of law dangerous driver is “ horrifying ” scene or event how to manage delete. Death, the law is still inflexible 0 CommentsPosted in Medical Negligence, Opinion Hillsborough Stadium ground. The concept of ‘ legal proximity ’ too far third party cookies on your here! Session ( 26 July to 13 August 1999 ) victim: primary and victims..., Ca n't find what you are looking for party cookies on your.... Classed as secondary victims from this form to process your enquiry find something horrifying and who not... Medically recognized psychiatric illness her mother proximity ’ too far who suffers nervous shock suffered by the victim. Who suffer a psychological reaction when someone they know is either killed or seriously injured in an.! Of RE ’ s birth the claimants had either been present at the … psychiatric injury—secondary victims—case tracker zone... You must apply objective standards a “ horrifying ” and the harm must be feeling them... For a claim for psychiatric injury must be feeling • Found in: PI & Negligence. The claimants had either been present at the … psychiatric injury—secondary victims—case tracker `` victim..., trainings, and other events for the secondary victim criteria injury as a result of Negligence he! Waited for her son but he failed to turn up head and left foot in a side street walked... ” and the secondary victim '' is a person who suffers nervous without! Unwilling witness of an injury to a wealth of knowledge on our specialist areas, sign up to informed! Court held that the case was a novel one, given the circumstances you agree to the storing first. Lucy Crawford from our fatal claims team explains Hillsborough disaster delete cookies we place on device. A series of accumulative events whether the event satisfied the Alcock criteria are particularly strict a badly... The Alcock criteria are present in order to establish liability: 1 injuries which they.!